I first read Three Cups of Tea several years ago. If you aren’t familiar with this book or the author, Greg Mortenson, basically the book tells the story of Mortenson visiting a mountainous region of Pakistan after a failed attempt at climbing K2. He is essentially taken in by some villagers and falls in love with the area, determined to do something to help them. He sets up schools, which kind of takes on a life of its own. I was really touched by the story and thought that it was wonderful, a sort of educational micro-finance and by micro-finance, I mean foreign aid of sorts given by a private citizen, organization, or company to another specific group.
Now there is controversy over whether Mortenson really told the truth about some of his adventures in the book after a damning 60 Minutes report. Mortenson is now accused of lying about when he visited the town that he initially set up the school in and about being held by the Taliban. On top of this, there have also been questions on the funding and handling of money given to Mortenson’s organization, the “Central Asia Institute.”
The idea behind Three Cups of Tea is a really cool one but I’m wondering if the potential lies might not take away from some of the story. I’m really struggling with this. Personally I believe that acts of micro finance can do a lot of good on a small, local level. Often times, I think it’s easy for foreign aid given to governments to be misused or just to not get to the people who could really use aid. Micro finance allows for the support of a specific group, project, or sector at a more direct level. In all facets of life, I’d rather hear the truth no matter how bad/boring/indifferent/ugly/ [insert other world with negative connotation] it may be. Pretty lies don’t do anything for me.
So I have two questions for you:
- How important is integrity if your point is still really good?
- Is there ever a need to embellish the truth?